FLASH
REPORT
Bureau Recommends 5.2 Percent Hike At Rate Hearing
The
Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California
yesterday made its case to the Department of Insurance for
a 5.2 percent pure premium rate increase. The Bureau's revised
filing is one percentage point more than its original submission
in September, an increase necessitated by Governor Schwarzenegger's
endorsement of AB 338. If Insurance Commission Steve Poizner
approves the filing for advisory rates on Jan. 1, 2008, it'll
be the first increase since July 2003 and perhaps a portent
of things to come. Poizner was unable to attend the rate hearing
due to the Insurance Department's in working with policyholders
and insurers dealing with the raging Southern California fires.
That left Chris Citko, CDI senior staff counsel, running the
meeting.
The Bureau's
original filing proposed a 4.2 percent increase contingent
upon the governor not signing AB 338. The new law, which affects
workers injured on or after Jan. 1, 2008, increases the window
during which injured workers may use their temporary disability
benefits from two years from the date of the first benefit
payment to five years from date of injury. Schwarzenegger
signed the bill into law earlier this month. According to
Dave Bellusci, chief actuary for the Bureau, this change will
eliminate about one third of the TD savings realized from
SB 899.
Despite
the signing of AB 338, the greatest factor in the Bureau's
proposed increase was the affects of loss adjustment expenses
– that is the costs associated with adjusting claims. Loss
adjustment expenses have not decreased commensurate with the
decline in losses from accident years 2003 through 2006. This
factor accounts for 3.5 percentage points of the proposed
increase. As for reasons that the LAE are not declining, Bellusci
points to new medical utilization review procedures, legal
challenges to regulations and legislation, and challenges
to the Permanent Disability Rating Schedule that are likely
increasing the cost of administering claims.
"To
the extent that there will be reduced litigation, we haven't
seen it yet. Maybe when the smoke clears from the reforms,
we'll see a decline in loss adjustment expenses," Bellusci
said at yesterday's hearing.
Bellusci
also informed the Department that the data submitted by AIG
and Virginia Surety Insurance Company are included in the
rate filing. AIG and Virginia Surety's data were excluded
from the July rate filing because of data inaccuracies and
anomalies respectively, but they have since remedied the deficiencies.
However, the data of Arch Insurance Company were excluded
because of data anomalies. Arch has less than one percent
of the market share in California.
Next year's
rate is now in the hands of Poizner, who must either accept
the filing or reject and order a different rate change in
either direction. Insurers, however, are not required to use
the pure premium rate and may price policies as they see fit.
Soure:
Worker's Comp Executive
Copyright © 2007 Providence Publications, LLC - All Rights
Reserved.